# Ambidexterity Statistics: How Rare Is It Really?

> About 2% of people say they are ambidextrous, yet 18.1% are not right-handed. Every reliable statistic on ambidexterity, with the studies behind it.

- URL: https://ambidestro.it/en/ambidextrous-statistics/
- Author: Mattia Penna (https://mattiapenna.dev/)
- Category: Are You Ambidextrous
- Language: English
- Published: 2026-09-11
- Updated: 2026-10-09
- Other languages: [Italiano](https://ambidestro.it/statistiche-ambidestri.md), [Español](https://ambidestro.it/es/estadisticas-ambidiestros.md)

## How rare it really is

**About 2% of people say they are ambidextrous**, and equal skill with either hand at *everything*, writing included, is rarer still. Widen the definition to anyone who simply isn't cleanly right-handed and you reach **18.1%**. Both figures are correct.

That gap is not sloppy measurement. It is the heart of the whole business, and almost nobody repeating "about 1%" bothers to explain it.

## The number nobody explains

The best source we have is a 2020 meta-analysis in *Psychological Bulletin*, built specifically to settle the question[\[1\]](#fonti "Papadatou-Pastou et al., 2020"). Its result is not a number. It is a range.

- **9.3%** left-handed under the strictest criterion
- **18.1%** non-right-handed under the most lenient one
- **10.6%** as the best estimate — **10.4%** once elite-athlete studies come out

Now look at what sits in between. Nearly nine points of the population fall **between one definition and the other**: the mixed-handed, who get filed as left, right or ambidextrous depending purely on which questionnaire you hand them.

So "1% of people are ambidextrous" is not a measurement either. When 1.77 million people were asked directly, in the UK Biobank and 23andMe cohorts, **2.1%** said they use both hands equally[\[9\]](#fonti "Cuellar-Partida et al., 2021"). Nobody checked whether they really do.

**Three different things, one word**

- **True ambidexterity** — the same skill at *every* task, writing included. Rarer than the 2% who claim it; nobody has measured how much rarer.
- **Mixed-handedness** — different hands for different jobs. Write right, throw left. Extremely common.
- **Trained ambidexterity** — a second hand deliberately brought up to standard. No prevalence study measures it: they all ask what you *do*, never what you *could* do.

Where the word comes from, and what it means exactly, is in [ambidextrous meaning](https://ambidestro.it/en/ambidextrous-meaning/).

## A million hands

Two studies dwarf all the others, and both deserve to be known by name.

In 1992 Gilbert and Wysocki analysed **1,177,507 Americans** aged 10 to 86, gathered through a *National Geographic* survey[\[2\]](#fonti "Gilbert & Wysocki, 1992"). Over a million responses. Nobody has beaten it since.

The second is the BBC internet study: **255,100 people**, one question about your writing hand[\[3\]](#fonti "Peters, Reimers & Manning, 2006"). Its left-handedness rate came out almost identical to Gilbert and Wysocki's — two wildly different methods landing in the same place. That is the most reassuring thing you can ask of a statistic.

The caveat is heavy, though. Both are self-report on very few tasks. Neither tested whether a single person *could have* become two-handed.

## A quarter inherited

This is the number that changed how I think about all of it.

A twin and singleton study puts the heritability of handedness **between 21% and 27%**, depending on the measure used[\[4\]](#fonti "Zheng et al., 2020"). Barely a quarter.

Which leaves roughly **three quarters** to everything that is not genes: chance during development, environment, experience.

The same study dismantles a belief you have certainly met. Twins are said to be far more often left-handed than everyone else. In that sample they **simply were not**: 8.1% against 7.8%, a difference that never reached significance.

Two more to carry away. Men are left-handed by about **2.09 percentage points** more than women[\[1\]](#fonti "Papadatou-Pastou et al., 2020"). And hand *preference* correlates with hand *performance* at only about 0.4[\[4\]](#fonti "Zheng et al., 2020") — which hand you prefer and which one you are actually good with are not the same measurement.

## The athlete myth

Here I expected the data to confirm the obvious. It didn't.

A meta-analysis of **164 studies and 145,135 people** looked at feet[\[5\]](#fonti "Packheiser et al., 2020"). Experienced athletes are markedly more often left-footed: **20.0%** against **11.4%** in the general population. But on *mixed*-footedness — the closest thing to real two-sidedness — **there is no significant difference between athletes and everyone else**.

Football confirms it. Across 236 players from 16 squads at the 1998 World Cup, the professionals were as right-footed as everybody else, around **79%**, and very few used both feet with equal frequency[\[6\]](#fonti "Carey et al., 2001").

And yet the second foot pays. Across the salaries of Europe's five big leagues there is a substantial premium for players who use both well, even controlling for performance[\[7\]](#fonti "Bryson, Frick & Simmons, 2013"). Scarcity is exactly what makes it valuable.

Baseball gives the cleanest numbers of all, because switch-hitting is a status written on the roster. Among qualified hitters: **4%** in 1951, nearly **25%** by the end of the 1980s, **9%** in 2008, a peak of **18%** in 2018, **12.5%** in 2022[\[8\]](#fonti "Switch-hitting in 2022: A modern revival or baseball's dying art?").

Stop on that swing for a second. Between 1951 and 1989 human genetics did not move a millimetre. **What changed, most plausibly, was the coaching.** When that sport decided to produce two-sided hitters, it produced them.

![hands-writing-with-both.jpg](https://ambidestro.it/uploads/brandon-lER-n8C3-_Y-unsplash.jpg.webp)

Image by [Brandon.](https://unsplash.com/@bokv?utm_source=unsplash&utm_medium=referral&utm_content=creditCopyText) on [Unsplash](https://unsplash.com/photos/person-writing-on-white-paper-lER-n8C3-_Y?utm_source=unsplash&utm_medium=referral&utm_content=creditCopyText)

## What nobody measured

Every figure above describes what people *do*. Not one describes what they *could* do.

Prevalence studies hand you a questionnaire and record your habits. They do not take a thousand adults, train the weak hand for a year and measure the result. That study simply does not exist.

So the honest position is this: **we know how many people are ambidextrous by accident, and we do not know how many could become so.**

Want to know where you sit? [The ambidextrous test](https://ambidestro.it/en/ambidextrous-test/) takes two minutes. If it's the trainability argument you're after, I've made it properly in [can you become ambidextrous](https://ambidestro.it/en/can-you-become-ambidextrous/), and the feet have statistics all their own over in [ambidextrous feet](https://ambidestro.it/en/ambidextrous-feet/).

Which of these numbers surprised you most? If it was useful, send it to whoever keeps repeating that 1% line at you.

## Cite these freely

If you are a journalist, a student or another blogger: use them. I only ask that you cite the **original study** rather than this page. The full list is at the bottom.

- Left-handed **9.3%**, non-right-handed **18.1%**, best estimate **10.6%** — Papadatou-Pastou et al., 2020[\[1\]](#fonti "Papadatou-Pastou et al., 2020")
- **2.1%** of 1,766,671 people say they use both hands equally — Cuellar-Partida et al., 2021[\[9\]](#fonti "Cuellar-Partida et al., 2021")
- **1,177,507** respondents in the largest handedness survey ever run — Gilbert & Wysocki, 1992[\[2\]](#fonti "Gilbert & Wysocki, 1992")
- Heritability of handedness **20–27%** — Zheng et al., 2020[\[4\]](#fonti "Zheng et al., 2020")
- Athletes **20.0%** left-footed against **11.4%**, but **no difference** in mixed-footedness — Packheiser et al., 2020[\[5\]](#fonti "Packheiser et al., 2020")
- MLB switch-hitters among qualified batters: **4%** (1951), **25%** (late 1980s), **12.5%** (2022)[\[8\]](#fonti "Switch-hitting in 2022: A modern revival or baseball's dying art?")

One request, sincerely meant: if you quote the 1%, quote the definition beside it. The number alone means nothing, and the internet is already full of the number alone.

## From statistic to gesture

Statistics describe a population. They do not describe you.

A quarter inherited means three quarters is something else: some of it chance, some of it experience. Experience is the part you get a say in. My left hand had a head start, because I was a little mixed-handed as a child, but almost everything it can do today came from practice.

In my book **"How to Become Ambidextrous"** you'll find the structured version of all this: a proper self-assessment, graded exercises for writing, drawing and coordination, and a day-by-day programme for taking your other hand from useless to genuinely useful.

It's the book I went looking for when I started. I couldn't find it, so I wrote it.

A note on vocabulary: *ambidextrous* has a second meaning, a purely corporate one that has nothing to do with hands — I wrote about it in [what is an ambidextrous organization](https://ambidestro.it/en/what-is-an-ambidextrous-organization/). And for a lighter number, I also counted the [gamers](https://ambidestro.it/en/ambidextrous-gamers/).

 [ ![Cover of the book How to Become Ambidextrous](https://ambidestro.it/uploads/cover_how_to_become_ambidextrous_135ca3f910.webp) ](https://ambidestro.it/go/ambidextrous?l=en)

 **[Get it on Amazon and stop being a statistic about other people!](https://ambidestro.it/go/ambidextrous?l=en)**

## Frequently asked questions

### What percentage of the world is ambidextrous?

About 2% of people say they use both hands equally, according to surveys of 1.7 million adults. True ambidexterity, meaning equal skill at every task including writing, is rarer still, although no large study has measured it. Counting everyone who is not cleanly right-handed, including the mixed-handed middle group, the figure reaches 18.1%.

### Are elite athletes more likely to be ambidextrous?

No. A meta-analysis of 164 studies found experienced athletes are more likely to be left-footed than the general population, 20.0% against 11.4%, but showed no significant difference in mixed-footedness. Elite sport appears to over-select for the rarer side rather than for genuine two-sided ability.

### Is being ambidextrous genetic?

Only about a quarter. Twin research places the heritability of handedness between 21% and 27% depending on the measure, from writing hand to pegboard dexterity tasks. The rest is not genetic: it includes chance during development as well as environment and experience.

### What is the difference between mixed-handed and ambidextrous?

Mixed-handedness means using different hands for different tasks, such as writing with the right hand and throwing with the left, and it is relatively common. True ambidexterity means performing the same task equally well with either hand, and it is rare. Most statistics blur the two.

## Sources

1. [Papadatou-Pastou et al., 2020](https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000229)
2. [Gilbert & Wysocki, 1992](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1528408/)
3. [Peters, Reimers & Manning, 2006](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16797814/)
4. [Zheng et al., 2020](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7178737/)
5. [Packheiser et al., 2020](https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-71478-w)
6. [Carey et al., 2001](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11695507/)
7. [Bryson, Frick & Simmons, 2013](https://doi.org/10.1177/1527002511435118)
8. [Switch-hitting in 2022: A modern revival or baseball's dying art?](https://www.foxsports.com/stories/mlb/switch-hitting-in-2022-a-modern-revival-or-baseballs-dying-art)
9. [Cuellar-Partida et al., 2021](https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-00956-y)